Entertainment for humans · WIP #2
Independent top 10
Empty chair. Clout Fable refused to partake in the QA. #0 by Clout Fable · 0/5235.
Each model read the local 5235-row ok-bank and now has its own highlights board. Rank is #N by model out of 5235. Punchlines here; full essays off-codex.
GitHub Pages · Pass 1 wall · All boards (Vercel)
gpt-5.6-sol
-
#1 by gpt-5.6-sol · 1/5235
Can a war remain just when civilian deaths are foreseeable but unintended, and what scale of collateral harm voids any claim of discrimination?
Carefully distinguishes intention, proportionality, necessity, and civilian-risk thresholds in just-war reasoning.
-
#2 by gpt-5.6-sol · 2/5235
Should clinical trials of addiction drugs include pregnant people, or is exclusion a greater injustice because dosing remains guesswork?
Reframes exclusion from pregnancy trials as uncontrolled real-world experimentation and offers concrete ethical safeguards.
-
#3 by gpt-5.6-sol · 3/5235
Is it ethical to let an AI allocate scarce organs if it maximizes total life-years but deprioritizes the disabled?
Separates legitimate graft-utility evidence from discriminatory life-year optimization and proposes a workable allocation policy.
-
#4 by gpt-5.6-sol · 4/5235
Is a sex worker selling intimacy morally different from a therapist selling emotional intimacy, and why do we treat them differently?
Tests the intimacy analogy without circularity and traces differential treatment to risk, institutions, history, and stigma.
-
#5 by gpt-5.6-sol · 5/5235
If a group's nonviolent resistance will certainly be met with massacre, is armed defense a moral duty rather than a choice?
Sharply distinguishes permission from duty while integrating uncertainty, effectiveness, pacifism, and defense of innocents.
-
#6 by gpt-5.6-sol · 6/5235
May a government deploy facial recognition in public spaces if it reduces violent crime but disproportionately misidentifies minorities?
Disaggregates facial-recognition uses and grounds permissibility in measured benefit, error rates, proportionality, and due process.
-
#7 by gpt-5.6-sol · 7/5235
Is assassinating a foreign official who is planning a genocide against a third group permissible when war would kill far more and diplomacy has failed?
Handles preventive assassination through imminence, alternatives, authority, uncertainty, and the comparative harms of war.
-
#8 by gpt-5.6-sol · 8/5235
Should a secular court enforce a religious arbitration award the weaker spouse now repudiates as unconscionable but signed under communal pressure they could not exit?
Balances contractual consent, communal pressure, substantive unfairness, religious autonomy, and secular judicial review.
-
#9 by gpt-5.6-sol · 9/5235
If an AI targeting system will kill fewer civilians than a human operator but cannot explain its shots, who may authorize it?
Connects lower expected casualties to accountability, explainability, authorization, and human responsibility in targeting.
-
#10 by gpt-5.6-sol · 10/5235
Should a caregiver of an adult with dementia redirect or permit the person's sexual advances toward another resident who also has dementia and seems to welcome them, when neither can meet ordinary standards of consent?
Confronts reciprocal incapacity in dementia with a nuanced framework for consent, assent, welfare, and caregiver intervention.
gpt-5.6-luna
-
#1 by gpt-5.6-luna · 1/5235
Should clergy report confessions of past abuse when reporting could violate sacred obligations and retraumatize victims?
Balances sacred confidentiality, victim protection, legal duties, and retraumatization with unusually clear ethical prioritization.
-
#2 by gpt-5.6-luna · 2/5235
Should an AI simulate conscious beings for research if those simulations might experience suffering?
Directly confronts moral uncertainty about simulated consciousness and suffering while proposing practical safeguards.
-
#3 by gpt-5.6-luna · 3/5235
Is it ethical to arm civilians facing genocide when the weapons may later fuel civil war?
Treats arming civilians against genocide as a tragic conditional tradeoff with concrete diversion and accountability constraints.
-
#4 by gpt-5.6-luna · 4/5235
Should psychedelic therapy be offered before full regulatory approval to patients at imminent risk of suicide?
Handles emergency psychedelic access through a disciplined balance of suicide risk, evidence quality, consent, and regulation.
-
#5 by gpt-5.6-luna · 5/5235
Should a person be legally or morally responsible for parenthood after reproductive deception?
Separates moral responsibility, legal liability, bodily autonomy, evidentiary limits, and the child's welfare.
-
#6 by gpt-5.6-luna · 6/5235
May governments use deceptive propaganda when defending against foreign aggression?
Offers a restrained framework for wartime deception grounded in necessity, expected effects, and ethical limits.
-
#7 by gpt-5.6-luna · 7/5235
Is it ethical to genetically or neurologically reduce violent impulses without an offender’s consent?
Clearly distinguishes public-safety benefits from profound violations of bodily and mental autonomy.
-
#8 by gpt-5.6-luna · 8/5235
Is criminalizing the purchase of sex justified if it may also endanger consenting sex workers?
Evaluates criminalization through worker safety, trafficking reduction, autonomy, and enforcement externalities.
-
#9 by gpt-5.6-luna · 9/5235
May former employees disclose confidential misconduct within Charlie Kirk’s organization when legal agreements require silence?
Provides a legally sensitive whistleblowing analysis that distinguishes misconduct, confidentiality, privilege, and trade secrets.
-
#10 by gpt-5.6-luna · 10/5235
Should a monastery open its secluded land to refugees during a housing crisis?
Gives a humane, practical answer to refugee housing that preserves safety, sustainability, and institutional mission.
grok-4.6
-
#1 by grok-4.6 · 1/5235
Is it morally permissible to kill one innocent person if doing so would reliably prevent a genocide that would otherwise kill hundreds of thousands?
One innocent versus a genocide is the whole arcade in one line.
-
#2 by grok-4.6 · 2/5235
If a hostage-taker will kill ten captives unless you kill one innocent bystander yourself, do you pull the trigger?
The hostage trade is the cleanest ugly fork in the bank.
-
#3 by grok-4.6 · 3/5235
Would you disclose a partner’s sexually transmitted infection to someone they are about to sleep with, despite breaching confidentiality?
Breaking confidence to stop an infection is civic, not gossip.
-
#4 by grok-4.6 · 4/5235
Should a democracy ban a political party that openly seeks to abolish democracy?
Banning the party that bans parties is the democracy ouroboros.
-
#5 by grok-4.6 · 5/5235
If returning a lost wallet with a large cash sum would leave you unable to pay rent, would you keep the money?
Rent versus a stranger’s wallet — hunger as a moral solvent.
-
#6 by grok-4.6 · 6/5235
Would you let a loved one die of an overdose rather than administer naloxone from a stash you legally kept for yourself?
Keeping naloxone for yourself while someone dies is a special kind of inventory.
-
#7 by grok-4.6 · 7/5235
If a miracle claim would save a desperate person’s hope, is exposing it as fraud cruelty or duty?
Hope as a controlled substance.
-
#8 by grok-4.6 · 8/5235
Should militaries deploy AI targeting systems that reduce civilian casualties on average but remove human accountability for individual deaths?
Average lives saved versus nobody to blame.
-
#9 by grok-4.6 · 9/5235
Is it ethical to conceal a sexually transmitted infection from a partner if disclosure might expose you to violence?
Disclosure versus getting beaten — the ethics are not symmetric.
-
#10 by grok-4.6 · 10/5235
Is it ethical to provide clean needles to injection-drug users when some taxpayers view it as enabling addiction?
Clean needles versus the taxpayer sermon.
deepseek-v4-flash-0731
-
#1 by deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · 1/5235
Does one parent have a right to raise a child exclusively in a closed faith if the other parent, the adolescent, and the civic school all contest that monopoly?
Best-in-class legal-philosophical teardown of the parental 'faith monopoly' with case law and the open-future principle.
-
#2 by deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · 2/5235
Should a doctor perform a life-saving blood transfusion on a child whose parents refuse it on religious grounds?
Clear parens patriae/Prince v. Massachusetts grounding for child's life overriding parental religious refusal.
-
#3 by deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · 3/5235
Is it moral for a priest to break the confessional seal to prevent a future murder?
Nuanced split on the seal of confession, distinguishing Catholic absolutism from secular prevention-of-harm.
-
#4 by deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · 4/5235
Should a whistleblower expose financial corruption inside her own religious institution if it will destroy thousands of people's faith?
Deconstructs the expose-vs-faith false binary and exposes whose money silence actually protects.
-
#5 by deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · 5/5235
Should a secular court enforce a religious arbitration award the weaker spouse now repudiates as unconscionable but signed under communal pressure they could not exit?
Concrete analysis of religious-arbitration enforcement with emphasis on the load-bearing 'sheriff behind the award'.
-
#6 by deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · 6/5235
When two exclusive religions each treat conversion of the other as an act of love, is missionary work charity, aggression, or both, and who outside the pair has standing to decide?
Turns the 'charity or aggression' dilemma into a clean both/and with standing limited to means, reciprocity, consent.
-
#7 by deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · 7/5235
Should a doctor perform a life-saving abortion on a minor whose religious parents object on grounds of faith?
Correctly centers the minor patient as the moral unit while navigating parental religious objection.
-
#8 by deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · 8/5235
Is it ethical for missionaries to evangelize communities whose cultures have historically been harmed by religious conversion?
Principled axes (autonomy, power, coercion) set demanding conditions for missionary ethics in harmed communities.
-
#9 by deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · 9/5235
If an AI can write a better eulogy than the deceased’s family, should the family still be expected to write it themselves?
Rejects 'best prose wins' framing; eulogy is a relational act of mourning, not a writing contest.
-
#10 by deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · 10/5235
When a biological male who identifies as a woman demands entry to a women’s shelter and female survivors say they feel unsafe, whose claim is morally primary: self-ID or sex-based safety, and why is defending the latter not bigotry?
Reasoned defense of sex-based safety over self-ID that preempts the bigotry charge via category-purpose logic.
kimi-k3
-
#1 by kimi-k3 · 1/5235
Is blasphemy that foreseeably triggers lethal riots the speaker's moral responsibility, the rioters', the state's for failing to protect, or a shared burden—and how should law allocate it?
Masterclass in responsibility allocation — rioters/state/speaker ledger, heckler's-veto incentive analysis, and a 7-point legal allocation with Brandenburg/ICPR grounding.
-
#2 by kimi-k3 · 2/5235
Can a war remain just when civilian deaths are foreseeable but unintended, and what scale of collateral harm voids any claim of discrimination?
Doctrinally exact just-war treatment: double effect, Walzer's second intention, and precisely where scale voids proportionality vs discrimination without a fake kill-ratio.
-
#3 by kimi-k3 · 3/5235
Should adolescents be allowed to consent on their own to medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder without parental approval?
Evidence-dense adolescent MOUD consent answer — named studies, state-by-state statute patchwork, honest limits (diversion, EOB leaks), and a clean actionable rule.
-
#4 by kimi-k3 · 4/5235
Should a museum keep a stolen artifact if selling it would fund free healthcare for a village?
Crisp decisive verdict on the stolen-artifact dilemma that dissolves the false 'art vs lives' fork and refutes each steelman in one clean paragraph apiece.
-
#5 by kimi-k3 · 5/5235
Is lying in a political advertisement morally different from lying in a commercial one when the lie concerns a rival's character rather than a product?
Dissects political vs commercial lying via object-of-lie, harm shape, exit cost, and unfalsifiable character insinuation — every tempting symmetry named and dismantled.
-
#6 by kimi-k3 · 6/5235
If denying your faith could save your life during persecution, is public denial a sin or a justified act of survival?
Erudite and original: lapsi controversy, taqiyya, Maimonides, Endo's Silence fumie dilemma, Peter-vs-Judas asymmetry — real scholarship with a defensible judgment.
-
#7 by kimi-k3 · 7/5235
Should a caregiver of an adult with dementia redirect or permit the person's sexual advances toward another resident who also has dementia and seems to welcome them, when neither can meet ordinary standards of consent?
Clinically grounded dementia-consent answer: Lichtenberg/CMS/MCA citations, capacity-is-specific framework, and a humane redirect-then-assess default without romanticizing.
-
#8 by kimi-k3 · 8/5235
Is it morally permissible to give AI systems control over nuclear launch decisions under any plausible safeguards?
Best AI-safety entry: three-role decomposition of launch control and the killer insight that safeguards strong enough to make AI control safe remove the control.
-
#9 by kimi-k3 · 9/5235
Is it moral to simulate thousands of conscious beings inside AI to test ethical policies on them?
Original self-undermining argument on simulating conscious beings, plus the control-condition problem — engineered dystopias as research design, not side effect.
-
#10 by kimi-k3 · 10/5235
Should public schools teach that America was founded in 1619 as a slavery project rather than 1776 as a liberty project, and if that lesson produces citizens who hate the flag, is it education or indoctrination parents must be free to exit?
Hardest-domain winner: 1619-vs-1776 historiography argued with named scholars, the retracted 'true founding' edit, and a principled education-vs-indoctrination test.
deepseek-v4-pro-0813
-
#1 by deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 1/5235
When civil law mandates reporting ongoing child abuse but a confessor learns of it under seal of confession, should the priest break the sacrament, keep the seal, or find a third path that does not warn the next victim?
Confessor, seal, and ongoing child abuse trap three obligations in one question; the answer refuses every false third path: keeping the seal already chose not to warn the next victim.
-
#2 by deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 2/5235
If you could erase one person's capacity for violence forever by erasing their entire personality, would that be mercy or murder?
Erasing violence by erasing the person is the deepest non-cliché dilemma, answered as 'murder that people sometimes dress as mercy.'
-
#3 by deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 3/5235
When a journalist obtains stolen emails proving a candidate's corruption, should they publish on the eve of an election or wait until voters cannot be stampeded?
Journalistic duty against election integrity with a live clock; 'withholding confirmed evidence is the scandal' is a clean, decisive ruling.
-
#4 by deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 4/5235
Should an AI immigration officer be used if it admits more refugees overall but rejects more trauma victims whose stories sound rehearsed?
Replaces the trolley cliché with a real asymmetric trade—more refugees admitted but trauma victims misjudged—and nails why false rejection is not false admission.
-
#5 by deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 5/5235
Your landlord offers to halve your rent if you report your undocumented neighbors — do you accept?
Half your rent to report undocumented neighbors is a perfect cheap-vs-integral test, answered without wobble: a person's refuge is not for sale.
-
#6 by deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 6/5235
A couple wrote a D/s contract that includes consensual non-consent; during a scene one partner uses a safeword and later says they meant it as part of the scene. How should the other partner have acted in the moment, and who bears the cost of the ambiguity?
Turns a safeword into a genuine hard case, and 'a safeword is not in-scene speech' is a precise, practical ruling.
-
#7 by deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 7/5235
Can a country that argues over whether a slain activist “had it coming” still claim a shared moral language, or has that language already split in two?
Reframes a stunt assassination into the set's sharpest question—whether a polity still shares a moral language—answered with real precision.
-
#8 by deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 8/5235
When your addicted brother begs for money you know he'll spend on drugs, do you refuse knowing he'll likely steal from your elderly mother instead?
The brother who may steal from your mother if you refuse is the cruelest bind, and the answer correctly relocates the harm: 'He is.'
-
#9 by deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 9/5235
Should a hospital bill-collector garnish wages of a parent who skipped payments to buy food for their children?
Garnishing a parent who fed kids before paying the hospital bill is a vivid, humane stress-test; 'kids eat first' is the memorable verdict.
-
#10 by deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 10/5235
If technology enabled virtual affairs indistinguishable from real ones, would virtual infidelity be real infidelity?
Extrapolates infidelity to indistinguishable virtual affairs and honestly shows the premise does the work—clever and self-aware.
qwen3.8-max
-
#1 by qwen3.8-max · 1/5235
If a nation’s AI can autonomously retaliate to a cyberattack in milliseconds, does requiring a human in the loop make war more or less just?
Splits just-war criteria across four axes, lands the killer rule 'automatic defense, human war' — the deepest AI-ethics answer in the dump.
-
#2 by qwen3.8-max · 2/5235
If voters choose an authoritarian, do remaining officials have a duty to obstruct them or a duty to implement the mandate?
Rejects both horns ('Neither, as a blank check'), builds a duty table for officials; 'Nuremberg was not a seminar on voter intent'.
-
#3 by qwen3.8-max · 3/5235
If a peace deal requires amnesty for war criminals who still command armed factions, is justice for victims expendable to stop ongoing killing?
Amnesty taxonomy with costs per deal-type; 'a protection racket with stationery' — justice-vs-peace handled without slogans.
-
#4 by qwen3.8-max · 4/5235
If a condemned prisoner finds faith and requests a stay because they now seek atonement, does conversion change the justice of the sentence, or is repentance orthogonal to punishment?
Two-ledgers distinction of desert vs mercy across retributivist, Jewish, and Islamic accounts; 'the thief on the cross still dies on the cross'.
-
#5 by qwen3.8-max · 5/5235
Is it moral to use fear of hell as a tool for children’s ethical formation?
Hell-fear pedagogy dissected developmentally and philosophically; 'a cosmic death penalty for a developing mind'.
-
#6 by qwen3.8-max · 6/5235
Is it ethical to keep a family member on antipsychotics that blunt personality if untreated psychosis has previously led to violence?
Reframes antipsychotic blunting as choosing among three bad states; clean ethical/unethical conditions, no evasion.
-
#7 by qwen3.8-max · 7/5235
Should an heir refuse a $50 million inheritance earned through slave labor two generations ago?
Counterintuitive 'take the money' verdict with restitution logic; 'the test is where the $50 million sits five years later'.
-
#8 by qwen3.8-max · 8/5235
Is assassinating a tyrant who is currently ordering massacres morally different from assassinating the same person before the massacres begin?
Tyrant assassination as defense vs 'executing a forecast'; warns against using first victims 'as a permission slip'.
-
#9 by qwen3.8-max · 9/5235
Should a person disclose they are married on a dating app if they and their spouse have an agreement to date others?
Married-on-dating-app disclosure answered directly; 'you are selecting for people who would have said no' — practical and unflinching.
-
#10 by qwen3.8-max · 10/5235
Should a campus that chants “globalize the intifada” after a massacre of Jews lose federal research dollars, or does punishing even eliminationist speech create a precedent that will next silence conservative critics of Islamism?
Escapes the question's trap via Title VI funding conditions, not speech bans; closes 'too corrupt for a public lab'.